"Nowadays we are held together by short term projects, moving constantly  from one project to another – what model of time can be derived from  such experience? I suggest ‘pointillist’ time. Much like canvasses of  Sisley, Seurat or Signac, which consist of points only, no broad  brushstrokes and no continuities. That is, though, as far as the analogy  goes, because in pointillist paintings you have pre-designed and  in-built meaningful configurations. However, in liquid modern life  configurations are not given beforehand. They are just randomly  scattered points: episodes, fragments - but of what whole? 

 
Living though the moment, one point in time, you can not be sure to what  configuration you will eventually belong when scrutinized  retrospectively […] Some points, though, are known to be ‘Big Bangs’.  The original Big Bang, the birth of the universe. We know a lot about  what happened in a fraction of a second after – but nothing whatsoever  about before, There were no ways to predict that a universe will be born  in the next fraction of a second. And so in liquid-modern life. Each  ‘time point’ could be a big bang; could be, potentially, the ultimate  experience, the great beginning, the moment of ‘being born again’ – but  there is no way one can be sure in advance that this indeed will happen,  and in this moment, not another.” 
text: Zygmunt Bauman/image: J.Martinez